• Research
    at the Visconti Studio

Visconti Studio is working with musicians and heritage organisations to preserve the sounds and practices of the analogue past for the digital future.

It’s impossible to imagine the 1960s and 1970s without music. It was the age when iconic record studios such as Abbey Road, Trident and Olympic experimented with analogue technologies to produce and record songs that continue to resonate today. Even in this digital age, vinyl is experiencing a revival; led by David Bowie’s Blackstar album, 3.2 million LPs were sold in the UK in 2016, representing a 53% increase on the previous year. This resurgence can’t be explained away by vinyl’s trademark crackle alone. Digital technologies are not only transforming the quality of sound, they are shaping our social and cultural experiences. Listening to and handling LPs or cassettes allows us to relive a bygone era – an era that could be confined to the annals of history if the analogue recording and production techniques associated with it aren’t judiciously preserved.

Losing a rich heritage

“Analogue music studio practices are becoming obsolete,” says Dr Leah Kardos, a lecturer in music at Kingston University London. “As the original practitioners are ageing, few engineers and producers specialise in analogue studio work anymore. Spare parts for vintage equipment are increasingly hard to get and the practical knowledge associated with their operation and repair is being lost. The rich heritage of analogue studio practices is on the verge of disappearing.”

Dr Kardos is project leader at Kingston University’s Visconti Studio, a practice research facility named after the legendary music producer Tony Visconti. Led by Professor Isabella van Elferen, the studio is at the heart of a large-scale, collaborative research project with the British Library and Science Museum. Equipped with a rare collection of vintage instruments, its aim is to not only document and safeguard the legacy of the analogue age, but to actively revive analogue objects and practices. “Analogue production and recording practices have an important heritage value, but this heritage is not sufficiently protected,” Dr Kardos continues. “The analogue studio’s material and practices require public and academic attention, which is why The British Analogue Music Studio: Heritage, Nostalgia, Future is documenting, capturing, and preserving these practices.”

Recording the future

To date, the Visconti Studio has already produced music with singer-songwriter Mary Epworth, the band Artbreak, and recorded material for Oly Ralfe’s new album as well as for the group Flight Brigade. Over time, the research team expects to produce a number of significant outputs, from musicological publications to records, tracks and albums, videos and interviews.

Methodology

The research project is divided into three core strands:

  • Analogue Analysis – researchers will analyse material such as songs, analogue technologies and scores; musical practices such as composition, recording and production; and cultural trends such as technostalgia and retrofuturism;
  • Analogue Archaeology – visiting artists and well-known producers, including Tony Visconti, will work alongside students and researchers to observe and share production practices, as well as create new compositions;
  • Analogue Heritage – various aspects of analogue studio culture will be preserved and made accessible to the public. Songs will be digitised, technology collections curated for museums, creative practices revived and paper collections archived.

A public-facing archive

The outcomes of the research will be publically shared in a number of ways: through an open access online archive containing audio files, photos, interviews and videos; through an interactive forum of citizen science called “Analogue Audiophiles”; in public workshops at the Visconti Studio, the British Library, and the Science Museum; and in, in 2020, a month-long international Analogue Music Studio Festival.

Bibliography

Bartmanski, D., & Woodward, I. (2015). Vinyl: The Analogue Record in the Digital Age. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Bennett, S. (2012). “Endless analogue: situating vintage technologies in the contemporary recording & production workplace.” Journal on the Art of Record Production, 7.

Cartwright,A.,  P., Besson, E., & Maubisson, L. (2013). Nostalgia and technology innovation driving retro music consumption. European Journal of Innovation Management16(4), 459-494.

Christopher, R. (2014). “Nostalgia, Memory, and the Haunting of Hip Hop.” The Routledge Companion to Remix Studies, 204.

Eno, Brian. “The studio as compositional tool.” Audio culture: Readings in modern music (2004): 127-130.

Greene, Paul D. and Thomas Porcello (eds) (2005) Wired for Sound: Engineering and Technologies in Sonic Cultures. Wesleyan University Press.

Higson, A. (2014). Nostalgia is not what it used to be: heritage films, nostalgia websites and contemporary consumers. Consumption Markets & Culture, 17(2), 120-142.

Hogarty, J. (2015). “Memories of the Material/Vestiges of the Virtual: Exploring the Impact of Material and Immaterial Formats on the Memory of Popular Music.” Rock Music Studies, 2(2), 148-167.

Lizardi, R. (2014). Mediated Nostalgia: Individual Memory and Contemporary Mass Media. Lexington Books.

Kardos, L. (2015). The Sonic Vernacular: Considering Communicative Timbral Gestures in Modern Music Production. In Audio Engineering Society Convention 138. Audio Engineering Society.

Katz, M. (2004) Capturing Sound: How Technology has Changed Music. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

McCarthy, A. (2010) Living with Digital, Resurrecting Analog, and Our Shifting Search for Sound. Gnovis: A Journal of Communication, Culture and Technology. http://www.gnovisjournal.org/2010/04/25/living-digital-resurrecting-analog-and-our-shifting-search-sound/

Massey, H. (2015) The Great British Recording Studios. Milwaukee, WI: Hal Leonard Books.

Milner, Greg (2009) Perfecting Sound Forever: the Story of Recorded Music. Faber & Faber.

Moore, A.F. (2012) Song Means: Analysing and Interpreting Recorded Popular Song. Farnham: Ashgate.

Moorefield, V. (2010) The Producer as Composer: Shaping the Sounds of Popular Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Niemeyer, K. (Ed.). (2014). Media and Nostalgia: Yearning for the Past, Present and Future. Palgrave Macmillan.

Pinch and Trocco (2002) Analog Days: The Invention and Impact of the Moog Synthesiser.

Porcello, Thomas (2004) ‘Speaking of Sound: Language and the Professionalization of Sound-Recording Engineers.’ Social Studies of Science 34(5): 733-758.

Reynolds, S (2012) Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to its Own Past. London: Faber & Faber

Roberts, L. (2014). “Talkin’ bout my generation: popular music and the culture of heritage.” International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(3), 262-280.

Schmidt Horning, Susan (2013) Chasing Sound: Technology, Culture, and the Art of Studio Recording from Edison to the LP. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Tilley, C. et al., ed. (2006) The Handbook of Material Culture. London: Sage.

Watson, A. (2014). Cultural Production in and Beyond the Recording Studio. Routledge.

Weium, F. And T. Boon, ed. (2013). Material Culture and Electronic Sound. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Scholarly Press.

van Elferen, I. and C. Blake (2015) “Sonic Media And Spectral Loops.” In Justin Edwards (ed.), Technologies of the Gothic in Literature and Culture. New York: Routledge: 60-70.

Van Elferen, I. (forthcoming) Timbre: Aesthetics of Vibration.

Van Elferen, I. (2018) “Dark Timbre:  The Aesthetics of Tone Colour in Goth Music.” Popular Music 37/1

Zagorski-Thomas, S. (2014) The Musicology of Record Production. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.